The modern multinational corporation is described as having
originated when the owner – managers of nineteenth- century British firms
carrying on international trade were replaced by teams of salaried managers
organized into hierarchies. Increases in the volume of transactions in such
firms are commonly believed to have necessitated this structural change.
Nineteenth- century inventions like the steamship and the telegraph, by
facilitating coordination of managerial activities, are described as key
factors. Sixteenth- and seventeenth –century chartered trading companies,
despite the international scope of their activities, are usually considered
irrelevant to this discussion: the volume of their activities, are assumed to
have been too low and the communications and transport of their day too
primitive to make comparisons with modern multinationals interesting.
In reality, however, early trading companies successfully
purchased and outfitted ships built and operated offices and warehouses,
manufactured trade goods for use abroad, maintained trading posts and
production facilities overseas, procured goods for import, and sold those goods
both at home and in other countries. The large volume of transactions
associated with these activities seems to have necessitated hierarchical
management structures well before the advent of modern communications and
transportation. For example, in the Hudson’s Bay Company, each far- flung
trading outpost was managed by a salaried agent, who carries out the trade with
the Native Americans, managed day- today operations, and oversaw the post’s
workers and servants. One chief agent, answerable to the Court of directions in
London though the correspondence committee was appointed with control over all
of the agents on the bay.
The early trading companies did differ strikingly from
modern multinationals in many respects. The depended heavily on the national governments
of their home countries and thus characteristically heavily on the national governments
of heir home countries and thus characteristically acted aboard to promote
national interests. Their top managers were typically owners with a substantial
minority share, whereas senior managers’ holdings in modern multinationals is
are usually insignificant. They operated in a preindustrial world, grafting a
system of capitalist international trade onto a premodern system of artisan and
peasant production. Despite these differences, however, early trading companies
organized effectively in remarkably modern ways and merit further study as
analogues of more modern structures.
1.
The author’s main point is that
A.
Modern multinationals originated in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with the establishment of chartered trading
companies
B.
The success of early chartered trading
companies, like that of modern multinationals depended primarily on their ability
to carry out complex operations.
C.
Early chartered trading companies should be more
seriously considered by scholars studying the origins of modern multinationals.
D.
Scholars are quite mistaken concerning the
origins of modern multinationals
2.
According to the passage, early charted trading
companies are usually described as
A.
Irrelevant to a discussion of the origins of the
modern multinational corporation
B.
Interesting but ultimately too unusual to be
good subjects for economic study
C.
Analogues of nineteenth – century British
trading firms
D.
Rudimentary and very early forms of the modern
multinational corporation
3.
It can be inferred from the passage that the
author would characterize the activities engaged in by early chartered trading companies as
being
A.
Complex enough in scope to require a substantial
amount of planning and coordination enough in scope to require a substantial amount
of planning and coordination on the part management
B.
Too simple to be considered similar to those of
a modern multinational corporation
C.
As intricate as those carried out by the largest
multinational corporations today
D.
Often unprofitable due to slow communications
and unreliable means of transportation
4.
The author lists the various activities of early
chartered trading companies in order to
A.
Analyze the various ways in which these
activities contributed to changes in management
structure in such companies
B.
Demonstrate that the volume of business transactions of such companies exceeded that
of earlier firms
C.
Refute the view that the volume of business
undertaken by such companies was relatively low
D.
Emphasize the international scope of these
companies’ operations
Answer:
1.
C To
understand the main point of the whole passage, review what the author does in
each paragraph. The first paragraph presents the genera; view that he
conditions in which early trading companies operated were too primitive to make
a comparison to modern multinational corporations interesting. The second
paragraph corrects this impression by citing their complex activities, and the
third paragraph, after reminding the reader of important differences between
them, closes by saying that early trading companies merit further study as
analogues of more modern structures. The author’s main point is to show that an
interesting comparison between early trading companies and modern multinational
companies exists and deserves further study.
2.
A The
question uses the phrase according to the passage, indicating that he answer is
explicitly states in the passage. In the first paragraph, early trading
companies are called irrelevant to at discussion about the origins of modern multinational
corporations.
3.
A Look
at the beginning of the second paragraph. The previous paragraph had ended with
the prevailing dismissal of these companies as unimportant. The author begins
the second paragraph with a transitional expression, in reality, however, to
emphasize a contrasting point of view. The first sentence lists an impressive
array of complex activities and then the author notes that the large volume of
transactions associated with these activities seems to have necessitated
hierarchical management structures. The author believes the complex activities
of the early companies required a multi- leveled management structure to
oversee them.
4.
C The
previous paragraph closes with the point of view, not shared by the author,
that the volume of transaction of these early companies is assumed to be low. The
author immediately contradicts this evaluation and counters it by listing the
activities the trading companies actually engaged in, noting the large volume
of transactions associated with these activities. Thus, the author includes this
list in order to attack the common assumption that the volume of business
transactions was low.
No comments:
Post a Comment